乌克兰少妇性做爰_欧美在线导航_欧美久久黄_欧美永久_国产一二在线观看_狠狠操一操_欧美性视频一区二区三区_日韩中文在线视频_精品国产一二三产品区别在哪_日韩特黄特色大片免费视频_亚洲欧美日韩国产精品一区二区_国产精品国产精品国产专区蜜臀ah_国产午夜成人无码免费_插插射啊爱视频日a级_大奶子久久_国产精产国品一二三产区视频_日本少妇高潮正在线播放_视频免费1区二区三区_国产精自产拍久久久久久蜜小说_人善交videos欧美3d残废

In general, there is not a huge difference between implementing a planar transformer versus a comparable conventional transformer in a DC-DC converter design.  However, they don’t perform as well as conventional transformers when used in a flyback topology, and since they are relatively uncommon, finding one that meets your specifications can be difficult.

One method of evaluating a planar transformer would be to try simulating it in a software package such as LTspice. To get a decent approximation of the transformer’s performance, it is necessary to use the transformer’s equivalent circuit as shown in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1: Transformer equivalent circuit. 

While software simulation is valid, there’s nothing like real-world testing.  The best evaluation would be to breadboard two simple DC-DC converter circuits, one with the planar transformer and one with a conventional one, enabling direct comparison of the transformer’s performance.

The evaluation circuits do not necessarily have to operate at the same input voltage, output power, etc. as your final design, but they should operate so that the transformers are within their recommended specifications.  Using a manufacturer’s reference design for the converter circuit is recommended in order to minimize the factors other than the transformers that would affect the overall performance.